masters and disciples.
the injured published this :
how proudly and fiercely defend and proclaim who have been or are our teachers and how easily we become self-taught many famous when they went up to the hump. For many it is very difficult to digest that has learned from someone who generally always above them.
's an interesting thought, though I've never met any dancer who criticize their teachers, or remove their importance, I imagine that happens though I have not lived. Instead, I come to mind are several reasons why a dancer may seem "self", at least in regard to the time in which many dancers do not go to regular classes.
First, the lack of advanced level classes. It is difficult to find and often are oriented to form the Society of Master. That's not bad, but it leaves orphan to advanced students who do not want to integrate a company.
The second, the lack of funds. A semi-professional dancer arrives just enough to renew costumes, and fancy, normal thing, go to intensive where learning new things with new people. The 30 euritos ronde monthly pay regular class a week supermarket. Is to think about it.
Third, a simple matter of marketing. If your students trust you and you tell them you are going to classes Laila, Laila think that obviously it is better than you and made you go professor. Or, almost like a recommendation.
addition, there is sometimes a matter of difference of style. For example: The first teacher taught you that you had a lot of Egyptian classical ballet. Change your school, discovered the American Cabaret. When you have developed your own style, you see that you're more comfortable with folk airs, but I like to have basis of other styles and teach in class. Saying "Student of Isis" and "Student of Rachel" when you dance has nothing to do with them creates false expectations among the public and the students. Then
apart are the envy and jealousy, but that better not speak, do not lead anywhere.
0 comments:
Post a Comment